Use Our May 2015 Drug Policy Tracker
|Austerity, foreign policy, membership of the European Union and immigration. These are all hot topics for debate in the run up to the general election. But May the 7th will be a defining moment for Britain in another way, too: the country looks set to host a Parliament that is radically different in appearance in comparison to any previous time in its history. The traditional Conservative/Labour monopoly on political power is nearing its end; the meteoric emergence of new, energetic parties have promised us all a vision of a better and socially just Britain. Politics is being shaken up. The electorate are demanding change. But have politicians finally started playing catch up with public opinion on failing British drug policy?
The last 5 years of Conservative rule has also coincided with huge advances in the liberalisation of drug policy across the globe; Uruguay has recently established a regulated market for Cannabis, various U.S states have themselves moved to end the criminalisation of Cannabis users contrary to federal legislation. Global campaigns to raise awareness about the terrible consequences of drug prohibition have gained unprecedented levels of publicity, and, unthinkable just a decade ago, many U.K political parties are now calling for serious reform to the status quo. Even some within the backbenches of the ruling party have called for a review of the current approach to drugs.
Whilst economic and foreign policy are also incredibly important areas of consideration when deciding who we should vote for, we must also demand proper leadership on the topic of drug policy from our leaders – an issue that has huge consequences on the socio-economic health of communities across Britain.
As a keen spectator of the ongoing political campaigns leading up to the general elections on the 7th of May, I observe that it can sometimes be difficult to discern the stance of politicians on various issues, especially in the midst of all the noise about the many hundreds of problems facing our country that require addressing. The recurring habit of politicians to take policy positions that seem to be contrary to comments made in years (sometimes months, or weeks) past also doesn’t help. That’s why at LEAP UK, we set about developing an interactive website that establishes clearly the positions of all the major political parties on drug policy at a glance, and what they plan on doing when they come to power (or how they intend on influencing policy while in Parliament), so you know exactly what you are getting when you visit the ballot box.
Visit the May 2015 drug policy tracker here. We encourage you to share this page with colleagues, friends and family!
Apart from the libdems they all seem to be completely weak when it comes to using even the slightest bit of reasoning re drug laws.
I am not sure why you edited the most important part of the Labour statement out. “We know drug addiction continues to be a major cause of crime. We will ensure drug treatment services focus on the root causes of addiction, with proper integration between health, police and local authorities in the commissioning of treatment. ” This approach to commissioning is what has been lost under the past two governments. That’s key in terms of what has happened in England with commissioning in most areas now being undertaken in isolation but people who have never met a drug user in their life.
Due to interface restrictions we couldn’t include everything, but we did our best to summarise the stances accurately. We made specific reference to firm statements and commitments at the expense of the rather more ambiguous ones like that which you quote above. We also needed to make room for comments made publicly by each leader – it is for you to determine how insightful those comments really are, and if they are an indication of future policy.
We do reference the fact that the Labour Party has a greater emphasis on harm reduction, and we provide a link to each manifesto for those who are interested in reading into it further. The point of the policy tracker is only to summarise the respective positions.